AP: Clinton proposes 401(k)s, matching funds
This woman has no shame! She just wants the size of the federal government to be HUGE!!!
Democrats should be outraged that a member of their party is calling for such extreme expansion of the government. They were all opposed to allowing individuals to invest a portion of their social security how is this different…other than is being a blatant “buy-your-vote-scheme”?
If she keeps opening her mouth this way…I’m going to become even more hopeful of a Republican victory!
Do you like this article? Share It!
1 comments to "More Socialism from Clinton"
About Me
gopfolk's shared items
Shared Science News
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(318)
-
▼
October
(21)
- “the IPCC forecasts of climate change are not scie...
- Invisible tank!
- Have $50 grand?
- Name that Country
- 6.6% increase
- The 'Worm'
- Name that Country
- Senator Kreitlow???
- Who has failed?!?
- The “Compromise” Budget
- Sunday Funnies
- Senator Robson Admits to Harming our State
- Friday Funny - Algore
- Algore and the “Prize”
- Name that Country
- More Socialism from Clinton
- MillerCoors?!?!
- Chicago Marathon and the Olympics
- Doyle and his corrupt governorship
- Name that Country
- What is not right about this?
-
▼
October
(21)
Labels
- 1st Amendment (3)
- 2008 Presidential Race (73)
- 2nd Amendment (2)
- 4th of July (1)
- 9/11 (4)
- Algore (12)
- Approval Rates (1)
- Arctic (1)
- Assembly (4)
- Astronomy (1)
- Australia (1)
- Automobile (1)
- Bailout (1)
- Bloomberg (1)
- Book (1)
- Bureaucracy (2)
- Business (3)
- Caledonia (11)
- Campaign Finance (1)
- Charlie Sykes (1)
- Chemistry (5)
- Cigarettes (1)
- Cigars (1)
- Clinton (15)
- Comics (52)
- Conceal Carry (3)
- Congress (11)
- Conspiracy (5)
- Constitution (3)
- Crime (12)
- Debates (1)
- Democrats (15)
- Doyle (12)
- DPW (1)
- Drilling (3)
- Economy (9)
- Education (11)
- Election Fraud (2)
- Elections (27)
- Electoral College (1)
- English (1)
- Environment (19)
- Ethanol (1)
- Ethics (2)
- Fantasy Congress (1)
- Federal Budget (8)
- Federal Government (2)
- Flag Day (1)
- Fox News (1)
- Gas Prices (2)
- Global Warming (62)
- Hate (3)
- Headlines (1)
- HealthCare (14)
- Hezbollah (1)
- HHS (1)
- House of Representatives (3)
- Huckster (4)
- Immigration (4)
- Impeachment (1)
- Innovation (2)
- Insurance (1)
- Interfaith Conference (1)
- Iran (1)
- Iraq (11)
- Islam (2)
- Jingle Bell Run (2)
- Journal Times (5)
- Judge Gableman (2)
- Junk Science (9)
- Katrina (1)
- Kennedy (1)
- Kenosha GOP (1)
- KRM (13)
- Language (1)
- Math (11)
- Mayor Becker (2)
- McCain (14)
- McGee (1)
- Media Bias (4)
- Medicare (1)
- Military (1)
- Minimum Wage (1)
- misc (29)
- Misc. (97)
- Money (1)
- Name that Place (45)
- NASA (2)
- NCLB (3)
- News (3)
- Nobel Prize (2)
- Number Game (1)
- Obama (20)
- Oil Companies (12)
- Olympics (2)
- Open Carry (1)
- Pelosi (1)
- PETA (1)
- Pints n Politics (3)
- Politics (7)
- Polling (3)
- Predictions (1)
- President Bush (3)
- Protest (2)
- Race (4)
- Racine (12)
- Racine County Board (4)
- Racine GOP (2)
- Rant (2)
- Religion (6)
- Republican Party (2)
- Resolutions (1)
- Rick Graber (1)
- Romney (7)
- Running (7)
- RUSD (13)
- Schools (1)
- Science (13)
- SCOTUS (2)
- Senator Lehman (1)
- Smart Growth (1)
- Solar Power (3)
- SSA (2)
- State Budget (24)
- State Convention (2)
- State Government (1)
- State of the Union (1)
- State Politics (27)
- Taxes (30)
- Technology (3)
- Television (1)
- Term Limits (1)
- Terrorism (5)
- Transportation (1)
- Travel (1)
- Trivia (122)
- UN; (2)
- Unemployment (2)
- US Senate (7)
- Veterans Day (1)
- Video (1)
- Voter ID (1)
- WEAC (1)
- Weather (2)
- WI Politician (46)
Chance says:
Wait, I'm confused. On the one had you say in your title that this is "socialism", but in the body you imply this is not very differant from the "invest a portion of their social security" scheme a while back. So which is it? Are both Clinton and Bush's plans socialist, or neither?