I used to have Math as a regular segment and it has fallen by the way side but I just saw an article on Scientific America that sparked my interest again so here is the math question:
“In the ancient society of Machudo, families wanted no more than three kids. Their eldest son had a chance of becoming king, so they would stop having children after they had their first boy. A family that had three children or had a boy was said to be "complete."
Assume boys and girls had an equal probability of being born. (In reality, boys are slightly more likely, but it's undignified for puzzle masters to deal with slight exceptions to basic rules.)
Warm-up: What fraction of complete families would have a boy?”
If someone can give me the right answer I’ll update this post with the remaining 5 problems!!
Trust me…this is fun!!
Friday, August 01, 2008
//
Labels:
Math
//
1 comments
//
1 comments to "Math"
About Me
gopfolk's shared items
Shared Science News
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(248)
-
▼
August
(24)
- I love it!!!
- Name that Place
- What would you look for?
- Friday Funnies
- Sorry…I’ve been busy!!
- Name that Country
- Well, it’s out today!!
- Name that Place
- VP choices
- And you all thought I was full of hot air…
- Name that Country
- Is this good news?
- Name that Place
- Guess the Number Game
- Name that Country
- Are you a pretentious snob?
- And it is over…for now…
- Just cause I’m lazy…
- Ah yes the Electoral College is back again.
- Proof that the Media just doesn’t get it…
- Name that Place
- Math
- Name that Country
- Posts…
-
▼
August
(24)
Labels
- 1st Amendment (3)
- 2008 Presidential Race (73)
- 2nd Amendment (2)
- 4th of July (1)
- 9/11 (4)
- Algore (12)
- Approval Rates (1)
- Arctic (1)
- Assembly (4)
- Astronomy (1)
- Australia (1)
- Automobile (1)
- Bailout (1)
- Bloomberg (1)
- Book (1)
- Bureaucracy (2)
- Business (3)
- Caledonia (11)
- Campaign Finance (1)
- Charlie Sykes (1)
- Chemistry (5)
- Cigarettes (1)
- Cigars (1)
- Clinton (15)
- Comics (52)
- Conceal Carry (3)
- Congress (11)
- Conspiracy (5)
- Constitution (3)
- Crime (12)
- Debates (1)
- Democrats (15)
- Doyle (12)
- DPW (1)
- Drilling (3)
- Economy (9)
- Education (11)
- Election Fraud (2)
- Elections (27)
- Electoral College (1)
- English (1)
- Environment (19)
- Ethanol (1)
- Ethics (2)
- Fantasy Congress (1)
- Federal Budget (8)
- Federal Government (2)
- Flag Day (1)
- Fox News (1)
- Gas Prices (2)
- Global Warming (62)
- Hate (3)
- Headlines (1)
- HealthCare (14)
- Hezbollah (1)
- HHS (1)
- House of Representatives (3)
- Huckster (4)
- Immigration (4)
- Impeachment (1)
- Innovation (2)
- Insurance (1)
- Interfaith Conference (1)
- Iran (1)
- Iraq (11)
- Islam (2)
- Jingle Bell Run (2)
- Journal Times (5)
- Judge Gableman (2)
- Junk Science (9)
- Katrina (1)
- Kennedy (1)
- Kenosha GOP (1)
- KRM (13)
- Language (1)
- Math (11)
- Mayor Becker (2)
- McCain (14)
- McGee (1)
- Media Bias (4)
- Medicare (1)
- Military (1)
- Minimum Wage (1)
- misc (29)
- Misc. (97)
- Money (1)
- Name that Place (45)
- NASA (2)
- NCLB (3)
- News (3)
- Nobel Prize (2)
- Number Game (1)
- Obama (20)
- Oil Companies (12)
- Olympics (2)
- Open Carry (1)
- Pelosi (1)
- PETA (1)
- Pints n Politics (3)
- Politics (7)
- Polling (3)
- Predictions (1)
- President Bush (3)
- Protest (2)
- Race (4)
- Racine (12)
- Racine County Board (4)
- Racine GOP (2)
- Rant (2)
- Religion (6)
- Republican Party (2)
- Resolutions (1)
- Rick Graber (1)
- Romney (7)
- Running (7)
- RUSD (13)
- Schools (1)
- Science (13)
- SCOTUS (2)
- Senator Lehman (1)
- Smart Growth (1)
- Solar Power (3)
- SSA (2)
- State Budget (24)
- State Convention (2)
- State Government (1)
- State of the Union (1)
- State Politics (27)
- Taxes (30)
- Technology (3)
- Television (1)
- Term Limits (1)
- Terrorism (5)
- Transportation (1)
- Travel (1)
- Trivia (122)
- UN; (2)
- Unemployment (2)
- US Senate (7)
- Veterans Day (1)
- Video (1)
- Voter ID (1)
- WEAC (1)
- Weather (2)
- WI Politician (46)
Unknown says:
I'm tempted to do a Google search, but I'll just guess.
Obviously, it has to be at least a 50% or greater, and greater than 50% makes a lot more sense to me.
So, I figure that there's a 50% chance of a boy on the first try, a 25% chance of having a boy on the 2nd try (.5 * .5), and a 12.5% chance of having a boy on the 3rd try (.5 * .5 * .5).
Therefore, 87.5% of complete families (.5 + .25 + .125) should have a boy, or... as a fraction... 7/8ths of all families.